USTFCCCA InfoZone: Polls & Rankings Hub
NCAA Division II
Women's Outdoor Track & Field
USTFCCCA #EventSquad Rankings
2019 Week #5 - April 16th
Squad Summary
WALSH -- 400 Meters
| Team Rk | Div Qual Rk | Athlete/Relay | Yr | Mark | Meet | Date |
|---|
Team Summary
WALSH
| Event | Natl Rk | Total | Avg | Squad | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Meters | 89 | 51.95 | 12.99 | ▼7 (LW: 82) | |
| 100 Meter Hurdles | 52 | 1:06.49 | 16.62 | ▲2 (LW: 54) | |
| 200 Meters | 124 | 1:46.94 | 26.74 | ▲14 (LW: 138) | |
| 400 Meters | 44 | 4:00.02 | 1:00.01 | ▲7 (LW: 51) | |
| 800 Meters | 11 | 9:13.17 | 2:18.29 | NR | |
| 1500 Meters | 12 | 18:42.33 | 4:40.58 | ▲4 (LW: 16) | |
| 5000 Meters | 4 | 1:10:53 | 17:43.27 | ▼1 (LW: 3) | |
| Long Jump | 91 | 18.42m 60-5¼ | 4.61m 15-1¼ | ▼9 (LW: 82) | |
| Shot Put | 22 | 48.65m 159-8 | 12.16m 39-11 | ▼3 (LW: 19) | |
| Discus | 34 | 147.08m 482-7 | 36.77m 120-8 | ▼1 (LW: 33) | |
| Hammer | 11 | 192.32m 631-0 | 48.08m 157-9 | ▲2 (LW: 13) | |
| Javelin | 31 | 127.38m 417-11 | 31.84m 104-6 | ▲5 (LW: 36) |
Event Summary -- Top 16 Squads
Women's 400 Meters
| Natl Rk | Team | Total | Avg | Conference | Regional | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lincoln (Mo.) | 3:39.66 | 54.92 | MIAA | Central | ▲1 (LW: 2) |
| 2 | Saint Augustine's | 3:40.86 | 55.22 | CIAA | Atlantic | ▼1 (LW: 1) |
| 3 | SF State | 3:41.65 | 55.41 | CCAA | West | ▲1 (LW: 4) |
| 4 | Oklahoma Baptist | 3:44.50 | 56.12 | Great American | Central | ▲27 (LW: 31) |
| 5 | Fresno Pacific | 3:44.92 | 56.23 | PacWest | West | ▼2 (LW: 3) |
| 6 | Lenoir-Rhyne | 3:49.41 | 57.35 | SAC | Southeast | ▼1 (LW: 5) |
| 7 | Simon Fraser | 3:49.76 | 57.44 | GNAC | West | ▲1 (LW: 8) |
| 8 | Grand Valley State | 3:49.78 | 57.44 | GLIAC | Midwest | NR |
| 9 | Texas A&M-Commerce | 3:50.08 | 57.52 | Lone Star | South Central | ▲1 (LW: 10) |
| 10 | Winona State | 3:50.59 | 57.65 | NSIC | Central | ▼4 (LW: 6) |
| 11 | Winston-Salem State | 3:50.82 | 57.70 | CIAA | Atlantic | ▼4 (LW: 7) |
| 12 | Benedict | 3:51.36 | 57.84 | SIAC | South | ▼3 (LW: 9) |
| 13 | Minnesota State | 3:52.45 | 58.11 | NSIC | Central | ▲33 (LW: 46) |
| 14 | Southern Wesleyan (S.C.) | 3:53.06 | 58.26 | Conf. Carolinas | Southeast | ▼3 (LW: 11) |
| 15 | UC-Colorado Springs | 3:53.59 | 58.40 | RMAC | South Central | NR |
| 16 | Chico State | 3:54.06 | 58.52 | CCAA | West | ▼1 (LW: 15) |
| 44 | Walsh | 4:00.02 | 1:00.01 | G-MAC | Midwest | ▲7 (LW: 51) |
#EventSquad Rankings EXPLAINED
USTFCCCA #EventSquad rankings places a rank order to a program's "squad" of athletes in a particular event, using the cumulative season-best qualifying marks from a team's top-four ranked athletes on the national descending-order list. As with the national descending-order list for qualifying and seeding purposes, marks are subject to be converted due to track size and/or altitude. A team must have four or more athletes with a valid season-best mark recorded with TFRRS to achieve a ranking in a particular event.
Data for USTFCCCA Rankings provided by TFRRS.org
USTFCCCA NCAA Division II Outdoor Track & Field
2023 Rankings Calendar
| Weeks | National TFRI | Regional TFRI | Conference TFRI | #EventSquad | KEY DATES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Tue 3/28 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 3/27 MEN | WOMEN | |||
| Week 2 | Tue 4/4 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 4/3 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 4/3 MEN | WOMEN | ||
| Week 3 | Tue 4/11 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 4/10 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 4/10 MEN | WOMEN | ||
| Week 4 | Tue 4/18 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 4/17 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 4/17 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 4/17 MEN | WOMEN | |
| Week 5 | Tue 4/25 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 4/24 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 4/24 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 4/24 MEN | WOMEN | |
| Week 6 | Tue 5/2 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 5/1 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 5/1 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 5/1 MEN | WOMEN | |
| Week 7 | Tue 5/9 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 5/8 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 5/8 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 5/8 MEN | WOMEN | |
| Week 8 | Tue 5/16 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 5/15 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 5/15 MEN | WOMEN | Mon 5/15 MEN | WOMEN | |
| Week 9 | Mon 5/22 MEN | WOMEN | ||||
| FINAL Results | Sun 5/28 MEN | WOMEN |
Week-by-Week Ranking
Only showing those with a season-best ranking in the top 25.